Speaker summary
⁠82%4 analyzed articles/videos444.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Eric Schmidt results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Begging the Question, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 30.3% saturation with 134.697 hits. Analysis detected 1,165.268 faulty-reasoning hits from 444.667 analyzed words across 4 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 11% and a BS Rank of ⁠14% (23,096 of 26,643 speakers). This Eric Schmidt is better (less manipulative) than 86.70% of the peer group.
Eric Schmidt
Speaker details
Total words: 444.667
Content count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

13% percentile
025507510013.3% percentile
11.0% BS Score4 analyzed videos444.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 30.3%30.3%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 15.6%15.6%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 14.1%14.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 19.3%19.3%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Speaker 11.7%11.7%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 11.7%11.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 18.2%18.2%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 10.7%10.7%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 9.9%9.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 14.1%14.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 30.3%, sitewide 11.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 18.2%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 19.3%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 16.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 16.1%, sitewide 15.9%Begging the Question: Speaker 15.6%, sitewide 1.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 14.1%, sitewide 7.5%Straw Man: Speaker 14.1%, sitewide 0.9%Ad Hominem: Speaker 11.7%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 11.7%, sitewide 1.4%Recency Bias: Speaker 10.7%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 1.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 9.2%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 9.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 2.7%In-Group Bias: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 6.9%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 4.0%Anecdotal: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 3.7%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos