Speaker summary
⁠46%1 analyzed article/video64 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Eric Dinowitz results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Begging the Question, and False Dilemma, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 48 hits. Analysis detected 240 faulty-reasoning hits from 64 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠69% (8,793 of 28,364 speakers). This Eric Dinowitz is worse (more manipulative) than 69.00% of the peer group.
Eric Dinowitz
Speaker details
Total words: 64
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

69% percentile
025507510069.0% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos64 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9%Begging the Question: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.5%In-Group Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos