Speaker summary
⁠42%1 analyzed article/video51 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ephraim Mirvis results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Burden of Proof, and Pessimism Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 40.6% saturation with 26 hits. Analysis detected 76 faulty-reasoning hits from 51 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 29.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠48% (14,980 of 28,364 speakers). This Ephraim Mirvis is better (less manipulative) than 52.80% of the peer group.
Ephraim Mirvis
Speaker details
Total words: 51
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

47% percentile
025507510047.2% percentile
29.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos51 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 40.6%40.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 40.6%40.6%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 18.8%18.8%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 18.8%18.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 40.6%, sitewide 15.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 40.6%, sitewide 1.1%Burden of Proof: Speaker 18.8%, sitewide 0.4%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 18.8%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos