Speaker summary
⁠96%1 analyzed article/video34 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Environmental health advocates results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Loss Aversion and Out-Group Homogeneity Bias, with Begging the Question as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 34 hits. Analysis detected 102 faulty-reasoning hits from 34 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠96% (1,347 of 28,364 speakers). This Environmental health advocates is worse (more manipulative) than 95.30% of the peer group.
Environmental health advocates
Speaker details
Total words: 34
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

95% percentile
025507510095.3% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos34 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Begging the Question: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.7%Loss Aversion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 2.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 3.1%Begging the QuestionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos