Speaker summary
⁠96%1 analyzed article/video38 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Energy Ministry of Saudi Arabia results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Optimism Bias, and Self-Serving Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 38 hits. Analysis detected 152 faulty-reasoning hits from 38 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠96% (1,263 of 26,058 speakers). This Energy Ministry of Saudi Arabia is worse (more manipulative) than 95.20% of the peer group.
Energy Ministry of Saudi Arabia

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

95% percentile
025507510095.2% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos38 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos