Speaker summary
⁠58%1 analyzed article/video142.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emmanuele Jannini results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Nature as the most egregious example at 57.4% saturation with 140 hits. Analysis detected 418.933 faulty-reasoning hits from 142.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 23.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠38% (17,483 of 28,187 speakers). This Emmanuele Jannini is better (less manipulative) than 62.00% of the peer group.
Emmanuele Jannini
Speaker details
Total words: 142.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

38% percentile
025507510038.0% percentile
23.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos142.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Speaker 57.4%57.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 35.0%35.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 27.5%27.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 12.3%12.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 18.9%18.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 14.0%14.0%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 9.4%9.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 14.3%14.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 57.4%, sitewide 0.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 35.0%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 27.5%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 18.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 14.0%, sitewide 4.6%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 12.3%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Speaker 9.4%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to NatureSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos