Speaker summary
ā 63%1 analyzed article/video50.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emily Peterson-Cassin results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Quote-first Misdirection as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 38 hits. Analysis detected 190 faulty-reasoning hits from 50.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 60% and a BS Rank of ā 76% (7,025 of 28,364 speakers). This Emily Peterson-Cassin is worse (more manipulative) than 75.20% of the peer group.
Emily Peterson-Cassin
Speaker details
Ranking context
Position among analyzed speakers
60.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos50.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile
Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0ā125%
Sitewide departure map
Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often