Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video2,867 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ashley Belanger results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Unattributed Quote, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 26.6% saturation with 3,053 hits. Analysis detected 8,977 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,468 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠41% (3,808 of 6,455 authors). This Ashley Belanger is better (less manipulative) than 59.00% of the peer group.
Ashley Belanger
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠41%Ashley Belanger (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 11,468
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

41% percentile
025507510041.0% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles11.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.5%1.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.2%2.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.1%1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.3%3.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 26.6%26.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.3%0.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.3%2.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.3%1.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 5.5%5.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 26.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.5%, sitewide 5.3%Unattributed Quote: Author 5.5%, sitewide 1.1%Anecdotal: Author 3.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos