Speaker summary
⁠39%2 analyzed articles/videos81 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emily Compagno results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Biased Writer Voice, and False Dilemma, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 77.6% saturation with 114 hits. Analysis detected 334 faulty-reasoning hits from 81 analyzed words across 2 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 37.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (12,387 of 28,364 speakers). This Emily Compagno is worse (more manipulative) than 56.30% of the peer group.
Emily Compagno
Speaker details
Total words: 81
Content count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

56% percentile
025507510056.3% percentile
37.9% BS Score2 analyzed videos81 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 77.5%77.5%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Speaker 29.9%29.9%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 29.9%29.9%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 29.9%29.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 29.9%29.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 29.9%29.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 77.5%, sitewide 15.9%Ad Hominem: Speaker 29.9%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 29.9%, sitewide 5.3%False Dilemma: Speaker 29.9%, sitewide 1.5%In-Group Bias: Speaker 29.9%, sitewide 6.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 29.9%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos