Speaker summary
⁠34%2 analyzed articles/videos39.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emily Blunt results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 34.3% saturation with 24 hits. Analysis detected 70 faulty-reasoning hits from 39.333 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 33.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠52% (13,682 of 28,364 speakers). This Emily Blunt is worse (more manipulative) than 51.80% of the peer group.
Emily Blunt
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 39.333
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

52% percentile
025507510051.8% percentile
33.3% BS Score2 analyzed videos39.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 34.3%34.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 31.4%31.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 34.3%34.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 34.3%, sitewide 11.1%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 34.3%, sitewide 1.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 31.4%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos