Speaker summary
42% 1 analyzed article/video 213.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emily Baldoni results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias , Optimism Bias , and Actor-Observer Bias , with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 15.9% saturation with 51 hits . Analysis detected 301.125 faulty-reasoning hits from 213.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.3% and a BS Rank of 6% (26,652 of 28,364 speakers). This Emily Baldoni is better (less manipulative) than 94.00% of the peer group. Emily Baldoni
Speaker details
Total words: 213.333
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.0% percentile 7.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos213.3 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 2.5% 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 15.9% 15.9% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 17.3% 17.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 9.1% 9.1% Actor-Observer Bias Sitewide 0.6% Speaker 9.1% 9.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 9.1% 9.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 1.9% 1.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 11.9% 11.9% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 7.5% 7.5% Circular Reasoning Sitewide 0.1% Speaker 3.8% 3.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 19.2% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 17.3%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 15.9%, sitewide 0.8% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Speaker 11.9%, sitewide 6.0% Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 0.6% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 7.5% Begging the Question: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 1.7% Ad Hominem: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 4.6% Circular Reasoning: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 0.1% No True Scotsman: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 0.1% Personal Incredulity: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst