Justin Baldoni and wife break silence after 'It Ends With Us' legal battle with Blake Lively 23%

By Emily St. Martin22%

7/9/2026, 5:24:44 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 21 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.1% saturation with 123 hits. Analysis detected 803 faulty-reasoning hits from 817 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 36.3% and a BS Rank of 23% (16,899 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 77.20% of the article peer group.

Emily and Justin Baldoni addressed the legal dispute nearly two years after Blake Lively sued the director for sexual harassment and retaliation. 
(Cindy Ord / Getty Images) 
Justin Baldoni has broken his silence after reaching a settlement in a lengthy and highly publicized legal dispute with Blake Lively. 
Baldoni and his wife, Emily Baldoni, presented a united front in an Instagram video the couple shared Wednesday that began, "So we have not spoken publicly for the better part of the last two years, and it's not because we haven't had anything to say, because Lord knows we have." 
The "It Ends With Us" actor and director said that although they'd wanted to address the debacle that involved dueling lawsuits with Lively, nearly two years of tit-for-tat fodder and culminated in a confidential settlement, "something was telling us not to." 
The couple said they prayed about when to make a public statement. 
"This feels like the moment," Emily said. 
"What does feel important," she continued, "is that we can genuinely say that we are sitting here today feeling immense gratitude for so many things and so many people and so many things that have happened to us." 
"Gratitude has saved us," Justin added. 
"I also feel that it's important as we say that  in that gratitude  it doesn't negate the injustice and the pain that we have also felt in the last few years, and we've had to wrestle with so many things and try to understand so many things," Emily said. 
"How could something like this even happen? 
Let alone disguised as a fight for women. 
So much to unpack. 
And the truth is, reality is, is that there's been a lot of trauma for us to move through as a family, which also makes it hard to speak." 
"We don't even know this is the right thing to say, but we just know we need to share something," Justin said. 
"What I will say is that there have been so many painful things that have been spoken into existence  " 
"Untruthful," Emily broke in. 
"We didn't want to add to the noise, so we just wanted to let the justice system run its course," he said. 
"And the truth and the facts have spoken for themselves," Emily said. 
Read more: Inside the bare-knuckle legal brawl between Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni 
The couple's statement comes a year and a half after Lively filed a bombshell lawsuit against Baldoni alleging sexual harassment, retaliation and several other charges on the heels of a messy "It Ends With Us" summer release and press tour that fueled rumors of on-set turmoil. 
Less than a month after the allegations against Baldoni rallied Hollywood against him, he countersued Lively, her publicist Leslie Sloane and her husband, Ryan Reynolds, for $400 million in damages, claiming they'd smeared his name in the press and wrestled away his control of the film. 
His suit was later dismissed. 
In May, two weeks ahead of the trial, Lively and Baldoni reached an agreement to resolve their legal dispute, bringing an abrupt end to the contentious battle. 
"The parties in the Blake Lively and Wayfarer Studios litigation have reached an agreement to resolve the matters," lawyers for both sides said in a joint statement. 
"The end product  the movie 'It Ends With Us'  is a source of pride to all of us who worked to bring it to life. 
Raising awareness, and making a meaningful impact in the lives of domestic violence survivors  and all survivors  is a goal that we stand behind. 
We acknowledge the process presented challenges and recognize concerns raised by Ms. 
Lively deserved to be heard. 
We remain firmly committed to workplaces free of improprieties and unproductive environments. 
It is our sincere hope that this brings closure and allows all involved to move forward constructively and in peace, including a respectful environment online." 
In June, a federal judge ordered Baldoni and his production company to pay Lively's attorney fees related to his unsuccessful defamation lawsuit against her, but rejected her bid for additional damages. 
Read more: Judge orders Justin Baldoni to pay Blake Lively's legal fees as legal fight nears end 
"So, how are we doing?" 
the filmmaker said in the Instagram video. 
"We are healing, and if you've ever been through something traumatic, you know that healing isn't linear. 
It lives different every day, and we have had to rethink for ourselves what is real. 
What matters, and it's this. 
It's our family. 
It's our friends. 
It's our community. 
It's our faith." 
Times staff writer Josh Rottenberg contributed to this report. 
Get notified when the biggest stories in Hollywood, culture and entertainment go live. 
Sign up for L.A. 
Times entertainment alerts. 
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times . 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.7%Emily St. Martin: 1.9%Associated Press: 2.2%Confirmation Bias0.7%This article: 0.0%Emily St. Martin: 0.1%Associated Press: 1.3%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 5.6%Emily St. Martin: 2.2%Associated Press: 2.9%Availability Heuristic5.6%This article: 0.0%Emily St. Martin: 0.6%Associated Press: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily St. Martin: 0.7%Associated Press: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 1.5%Emily St. Martin: 0.3%Associated Press: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias1.5%This article: 10.6%Emily St. Martin: 6.9%Associated Press: 5.3%Framing Effect10.6%This article: 0.0%Emily St. Martin: 0.2%Associated Press: 0.8%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily St. Martin: 0.1%Associated Press: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily St. Martin: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 7.7%Emily St. Martin: 1.4%Associated Press: 1.7%Optimism Bias7.7%This article: 0.0%Emily St. Martin: 0.2%Associated Press: 1.3%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 15.1%Emily St. Martin: 5.8%Associated Press: 7.3%Negativity Bias15.1%This article: 6.2%Emily St. Martin: 2.7%Associated Press: 1.6%Self-Serving Bias6.2%This article: 0.0%Emily St. Martin: 0.1%Associated Press: 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily St. Martin: 0.1%Associated Press: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.4%Emily St. Martin: 0.8%Associated Press: 0.8%In-Group Bias0.4%This article: 0.0%Emily St. Martin: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 3.3%Emily St. Martin: 6.1%Associated Press: 3.8%Halo Effect3.3%This article: 0.0%Emily St. Martin: 0.2%Associated Press: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily St. Martin: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 4.7%Emily St. Martin: 0.8%Associated Press: 1.4%Recency Bias4.7%This article: 0.0%Emily St. Martin: 0.3%Associated Press: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily St. Martin: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily St. Martin: 1.1%Associated Press: 0.7%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily St. Martin: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily St. Martin: 3.7%Associated Press: 4.1%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily St. Martin: 0.4%Associated Press: 1.0%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily St. Martin: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 1.5%Emily St. Martin: 0.1%Associated Press: 0.1%Circular Reasoning1.5%This article: 0.5%Emily St. Martin: 1.1%Associated Press: 3.3%Hasty Generalization0.5%This article: 0.0%Emily St. Martin: 0.1%Associated Press: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily St. Martin: 0.8%Associated Press: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 9.5%Emily St. Martin: 7.6%Associated Press: 4.6%Appeal to Emotion9.5%This article: 0.0%Emily St. Martin: 0.6%Associated Press: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily St. Martin: 1.3%Associated Press: 1.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily St. Martin: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 2.7%Emily St. Martin: 0.5%Associated Press: 0.5%Burden of Proof2.7%This article: 3.2%Emily St. Martin: 0.1%Associated Press: 0.1%Appeal to Nature3.2%This article: 0.0%Emily St. Martin: 0.1%Associated Press: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 2.8%Emily St. Martin: 2.4%Associated Press: 1.8%Anecdotal2.8%This article: 1.0%Emily St. Martin: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%No True Scotsman1.0%This article: 8.2%Emily St. Martin: 0.8%Associated Press: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)8.2%This article: 0.0%Emily St. Martin: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily St. Martin: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.9%Emily St. Martin: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.9%This article: 0.0%Emily St. Martin: 0.5%Associated Press: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily St. Martin: 0.5%Associated Press: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily St. Martin: 2.5%Associated Press: 2.0%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily St. Martin: 2.1%Associated Press: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 7.7%Emily St. Martin: 4.4%Associated Press: 6.0%Biased Writer Voice7.7%This article: 0.0%Emily St. Martin: 0.6%Associated Press: 1.8%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily St. Martin: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily St. Martin: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 4.5%Emily St. Martin: 1.1%Associated Press: 3.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…4.5%

817 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers38%attributed speech504writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 50 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 41 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageEmily Baldoni • 7 words • 0.0% coverageEmily Baldoni • 38 words • 0.0% coverageJustin Baldoni • 6 words • 0.0% coverageEmily Baldoni • 51 words • 0.0% coverageEmily Baldoni • 7 words • 0.0% coverageEmily Baldoni • 8 words • 0.0% coverageEmily Baldoni • 4 words • 0.0% coverageEmily Baldoni • 29 words • 0.0% coverageJustin Baldoni • 22 words • 0.0% coverageJustin Baldoni • 21 words • 0.0% coverageEmily Baldoni • 4 words • 0.0% coverageJustin Baldoni • 22 words • 0.0% coverageEmily Baldoni • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 46 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 46 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWayfarer Studios • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageJustin Baldoni • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageJustin Baldoni • 17 words • 0.0% coverageJustin Baldoni • 16 words • 0.0% coverageJustin Baldoni • 5 words • 0.0% coverageJustin Baldoni • 3 words • 0.0% coverageJustin Baldoni • 3 words • 0.0% coverageJustin Baldoni • 3 words • 0.0% coverageJustin Baldoni • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Emily Baldoni

93%flagged-word coverage
160 attributed words51% of attributed speech74% writer coverage
0%7.5%15.0%Biased Writer Voice-12.5 ptsWriter: 12.5%Emily Baldoni: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -7.3 ptsWriter: 7.3%Emily Baldoni: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.