Keyword summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,962 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Justin Baldoni results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Self-Serving Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 1,032 hits . Analysis detected 5,706 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,703 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 16% (31,510 of 37,170 keywords). This Justin Baldoni is better (less manipulative) than 84.80% of the peer group. Justin Baldoni
Keyword details
Total words: 9,703
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
15% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 15.2% percentile 1.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.6% 10.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.8% Tu Quoque: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst