Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video751 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Daniel Bates results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.3% saturation with 278 hits. Analysis detected 1,435 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,253 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠77% (1,439 of 6,238 authors). This Daniel Bates is worse (more manipulative) than 76.90% of the peer group.
Daniel Bates
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠77%Daniel Bates (selected)5%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,253
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

77% percentile
025507510076.9% percentile
4.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 9.0%9.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 12.3%12.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 6.2%6.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 4.1%4.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 2.6%2.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 1.6%1.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 7.2%7.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 2.5%2.5%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Author 2.8%2.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 9.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 12.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Author 6.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.7%Begging the Question: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.7%Recency Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Primacy Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.9%Unattributed Quote: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos