Speaker summary
⁠96%2 analyzed articles/videos482 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ellis results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Unattributed Quote, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 46.5% saturation with 224 hits. Analysis detected 1,170 faulty-reasoning hits from 482 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 11% and a BS Rank of ⁠14% (23,940 of 27,710 speakers). This Ellis is better (less manipulative) than 86.40% of the peer group.
Ellis
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 482
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

14% percentile
025507510013.6% percentile
11.0% BS Score2 analyzed videos482 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 38.0%38.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 46.5%46.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 24.7%24.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 4.6%4.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 11.2%11.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 10.8%10.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 11.0%11.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 6.4%6.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 12.0%12.0%Composition/DivisionSitewide 0.2%Speaker 8.9%8.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Speaker 46.5%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 38.0%, sitewide 8.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 26.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 24.7%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 15.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 12.0%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 11.1%False Dilemma: Speaker 11.0%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 10.8%, sitewide 0.8%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 9.3%, sitewide 1.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 9.1%Composition/Division: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 0.2%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 4.6%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 5.3%Slippery Slope: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 1.7%Recency Bias: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 2.7%Anecdotal: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 0.2%Begging the Question: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 1.7%Blind-Spot Bias: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 0.2%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos