Speaker summary
⁠55%1 analyzed article/video65.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Elizabeth Gallup results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Begging the Question, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 55.1% saturation with 40.5 hits. Analysis detected 143.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 65.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 37.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (12,458 of 28,364 speakers). This Elizabeth Gallup is worse (more manipulative) than 56.10% of the peer group.
Elizabeth Gallup
Speaker details
Total words: 65.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

56% percentile
025507510056.1% percentile
37.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos65.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 55.1%55.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 55.1%55.1%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Speaker 22.4%22.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 27.6%27.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 27.6%27.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 55.1%, sitewide 15.9%Begging the Question: Speaker 55.1%, sitewide 1.7%Framing Effect: Speaker 27.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 27.6%, sitewide 19.2%Bandwagon: Speaker 22.4%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos