Speaker summary
⁠76%1 analyzed article/video46.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Eliel Cruz results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Begging the Question, Biased Writer Voice, and False Dilemma, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 70 hits. Analysis detected 245 faulty-reasoning hits from 46.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 66.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠79% (6,153 of 28,364 speakers). This Eliel Cruz is worse (more manipulative) than 78.30% of the peer group.
Eliel Cruz
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 46.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

78% percentile
025507510078.3% percentile
66.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos46.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Begging the Question: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.7%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 5.3%False Dilemma: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.5%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos