Speaker summary
⁠42%4 analyzed articles/videos185.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Elaine Forbes results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Middle Ground, and Appeal to Emotion, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 15.7% saturation with 29.07 hits. Analysis detected 122.087 faulty-reasoning hits from 185.5 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 11.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠15% (22,942 of 26,943 speakers). This Elaine Forbes is better (less manipulative) than 85.10% of the peer group.
Elaine Forbes
Speaker details
Total words: 185.5
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

15% percentile
025507510014.9% percentile
11.6% BS Score4 analyzed videos185.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Middle GroundSitewide 0.1%Speaker 11.5%11.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 15.7%15.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 11.5%11.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 14.0%14.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 5.5%5.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 14.0%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 15.7%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Speaker 11.5%, sitewide 6.7%Middle Ground: Speaker 11.5%, sitewide 0.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos