Speaker summary
⁠41%6 analyzed articles/videos200 analyzed words
BS Summary: These EdSource results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority and Negativity Bias, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 22% saturation with 44 hits. Analysis detected 78 faulty-reasoning hits from 200 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 13% and a BS Rank of ⁠18% (23,268 of 28,364 speakers). This EdSource is better (less manipulative) than 82.00% of the peer group.
EdSource
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 200
Article count: 6
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

18% percentile
025507510018.0% percentile
13.0% BS Score6 analyzed videos200 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 22.0%22.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 7.0%7.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 10.0%10.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 22.0%, sitewide 7.5%Negativity Bias: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 10.0%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos