Speaker summary
96%1 analyzed article/video13 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ed Miliband results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect and Quote-first Misdirection, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 13 hits. Analysis detected 39 faulty-reasoning hits from 13 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of 96% (1,275 of 28,364 speakers). This Ed Miliband is worse (more manipulative) than 95.50% of the peer group.
Ed Miliband
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 13
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

96% percentile
025507510095.5% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos13 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos