Speaker summary
⁠65%1 analyzed article/video201 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ed Lewis results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Ad Hominem, and Actor-Observer Bias, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 23% saturation with 49.295 hits. Analysis detected 443.947 faulty-reasoning hits from 201 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 11.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠15% (24,321 of 28,364 speakers). This Ed Lewis is better (less manipulative) than 85.70% of the peer group.
Ed Lewis
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 201
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

14% percentile
025507510014.3% percentile
11.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos201 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 23.0%23.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 18.0%18.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 16.2%16.2%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide 0.6%Speaker 15.8%15.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 13.7%13.7%Middle GroundSitewide 0.1%Speaker 11.8%11.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 15.8%15.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 9.2%9.2%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Speaker 8.8%8.8%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 8.9%8.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 13.7%, sitewide 26.9%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 23.0%, sitewide 3.7%Negativity Bias: Speaker 9.2%, sitewide 19.2%Ad Hominem: Speaker 18.0%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 16.2%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 9.2%, sitewide 15.9%Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 15.8%, sitewide 0.6%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 15.8%, sitewide 5.3%Middle Ground: Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 0.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 10.5%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 4.6%Begging the Question: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 1.7%Primacy Effect: Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 0.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 6.0%False Dilemma: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 1.5%In-Group Bias: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 6.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos