Speaker summary
⁠70%1 analyzed article/video259 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ed Flynn results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 42.3% saturation with 149 hits. Analysis detected 493.182 faulty-reasoning hits from 259 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠11% (25,278 of 28,364 speakers). This Ed Flynn is better (less manipulative) than 89.10% of the peer group.
Ed Flynn
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 259
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

11% percentile
025507510010.9% percentile
9.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos259 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 18.7%18.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 42.3%42.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 8.0%8.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 8.0%8.0%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 8.8%8.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 9.9%9.9%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 6.0%6.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 12.2%12.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 2.3%2.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 42.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 19.2%Slippery Slope: Speaker 18.7%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 12.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 12.2%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 11.1%Recency Bias: Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 1.5%Optimism Bias: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 1.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 5.3%Begging the Question: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 1.7%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos