Author summary
89% 1 analyzed article/video 617 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lance Reynolds results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Recency Bias , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 16.7% saturation with 310 hits . Analysis detected 2,002 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,851 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.7% and a BS Rank of 82% (1,240 of 6,628 authors). This Lance Reynolds is worse (more manipulative) than 81.30% of the peer group. Lance Reynolds
Author details
Total words: 1,851
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
81% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 81.3% percentile 4.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.8% 10.8% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 13.1% 13.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.3% 11.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 16.8% 16.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.4% 1.4% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 6.7% 6.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 10.9% 10.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.3%, sitewide 19.2% Availability Heuristic: Author 16.8%, sitewide 9.1% Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.9%, sitewide 15.9% Recency Bias: Author 13.1%, sitewide 2.7% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.7%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 6.7%, sitewide 1.1% Optimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.8%, sitewide 3.3% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.7% Primacy Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst