Speaker summary
⁠56%2 analyzed articles/videos154.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Earnie Stewart results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Confirmation Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 54.5% saturation with 94.875 hits. Analysis detected 232.875 faulty-reasoning hits from 154.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 19% and a BS Rank of ⁠31% (19,804 of 28,364 speakers). This Earnie Stewart is better (less manipulative) than 69.80% of the peer group.
Earnie Stewart
Speaker details
Total words: 154.667
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

30% percentile
025507510030.2% percentile
19.0% BS Score2 analyzed videos154.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 54.5%54.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 12.1%12.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 12.1%12.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 12.1%12.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 12.1%12.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 11.2%11.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 54.5%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Speaker 12.1%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 12.1%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Speaker 12.1%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 12.1%, sitewide 4.6%Halo Effect: Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos