Speaker summary
⁠39%1 analyzed article/video108 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Earle Fisher results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 33.3% saturation with 36 hits. Analysis detected 72 faulty-reasoning hits from 108 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 33.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (16,662 of 35,546 speakers). This Earle Fisher is worse (more manipulative) than 53.10% of the peer group.
Earle Fisher
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠54%Earle Fisher (selected)34%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 108
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

53% percentile
025507510053.1% percentile
33.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos108 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 33.3%33.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 33.3%33.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Halo Effect: Speaker 33.3%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Speaker 33.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos