Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Allie Maury results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Ad Hominem, and Hasty Generalization, with False Dilemma as the most egregious example at 1.8% saturation with 169 hits. Analysis detected 990 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,273 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 7,552 authors). This Allie Maury is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Allie Maury
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Cleveland Documenters1%
0%T. Christian Miller1%
0%Ken Armstrong1%
1%Brenna Ehrlich1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%Allie Maury (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 9,273
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles9.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.8%1.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 0.6%0.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.1%1.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.4%0.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.7%0.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.2%0.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 0.3%0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Author 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.1%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Ad Hominem: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.1%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos