Author summary
2% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,543 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Katherine Burgess results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma , Framing Effect , and In-Group Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 3.9% saturation with 598 hits . Analysis detected 2,742 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,445 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.7% and a BS Rank of 1% (7,505 of 7,554 authors). This Katherine Burgess is better (less manipulative) than 99.40% of the peer group. Katherine Burgess
Author details
Total words: 15,445
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.6% percentile 0.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles15.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.8% 1.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.4% 0.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.0% Begging the Question: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.8% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst