Speaker summary
⁠81%1 analyzed article/video52 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Eakin results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, False Dilemma, and Framing Effect, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 80.8% saturation with 42 hits. Analysis detected 123 faulty-reasoning hits from 52 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 59.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠75% (7,153 of 28,364 speakers). This Eakin is worse (more manipulative) than 74.80% of the peer group.
Eakin
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠75%Eakin (selected)60%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 52
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

75% percentile
025507510074.8% percentile
59.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos52 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 80.8%80.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 51.9%51.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 51.9%51.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 51.9%51.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Indoctrination: Speaker 80.8%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 51.9%, sitewide 7.5%False Dilemma: Speaker 51.9%, sitewide 1.5%Framing Effect: Speaker 51.9%, sitewide 26.9%IndoctrinationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos

Toward a Theory⁠59%
Slate Magazine⁠69%By Laura Miller⁠59%7/21/2026, 8:13:31 AM