Author summary
â 58% 3 analyzed articles/videos 3,225 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Laura Miller results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 25.6% saturation with 3,033 hits . Analysis detected 13,546 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,825 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of â 47% (3,302 of 6,194 authors). This Laura Miller is better (less manipulative) than 53.30% of the peer group. Laura Miller
Author details
Total words: 11,825
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
47% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 46.7% percentile 2.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles11.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 25.6% 25.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.7% 6.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.5% 11.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.1% 2.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.9% 2.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.8% 3.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.7%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 25.6%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 11.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 5.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.0% Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst