Speaker summary
58% 1 analyzed article/video 500.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dustin Adkins results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 17.9% saturation with 131 hits . Analysis detected 662.611 faulty-reasoning hits from 500.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.9% and a BS Rank of 4% (27,295 of 28,364 speakers). This Dustin Adkins is better (less manipulative) than 96.20% of the peer group. Dustin Adkins
Speaker details
Total words: 500.5
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
4% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 3.8% percentile 5.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos500.5 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 5.7% 5.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 17.9% 17.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 3.3% 3.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 1.4% 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 7.3% 7.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 6.2% 6.2% No True Scotsman Sitewide 0.1% Speaker 6.0% 6.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 12.5% 12.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 9.6% 9.6% Primacy Effect Sitewide 0.9% Speaker 4.9% 4.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Negativity Bias: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 19.2% Halo Effect: Speaker 17.9%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 12.5%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Anecdotal: Speaker 9.6%, sitewide 5.2% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 0.8% Indoctrination: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 0.0% No True Scotsman: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 0.1% Primacy Effect: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 0.9% False Dilemma: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 1.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 0.0% Begging the Question: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 1.7% Circular Reasoning: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 0.1% Composition/Division: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 0.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst