Author summary
35% 1 analyzed article/video 1,271 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nancy Niero results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Hasty Generalization , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 6.7% saturation with 257 hits . Analysis detected 2,693 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,813 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 30% (4,682 of 6,628 authors). This Nancy Niero is better (less manipulative) than 70.60% of the peer group. Nancy Niero
Author details
Total words: 3,813
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
29% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 29.4% percentile 2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.7% 6.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.8% 5.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.9% 2.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.9% 3.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.8% 4.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 5.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Author 3.9%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Primacy Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst