Speaker summary
72% 2 analyzed articles/videos 371 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dror Etkes results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Confirmation Bias , and Composition/Division , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 23.8% saturation with 133 hits . Analysis detected 874.994 faulty-reasoning hits from 371 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 11.7% and a BS Rank of 16% (24,054 of 28,364 speakers). This Dror Etkes is better (less manipulative) than 84.80% of the peer group. Dror Etkes
Speaker details
Total words: 371
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
15% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 15.2% percentile 11.7% BS Score2 analyzed videos371 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 28.1% 28.1% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 22.0% 22.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 23.8% 23.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 6.8% 6.8% Composition/Division Sitewide 0.2% Speaker 11.8% 11.8% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 13.4% 13.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 17.0% 17.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 11.8% 11.8% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Speaker 7.0% 7.0% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Speaker 6.8% 6.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 28.1%, sitewide 7.5% Framing Effect: Speaker 17.0%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 23.8%, sitewide 11.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 22.0%, sitewide 3.3% Negativity Bias: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 19.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 13.4%, sitewide 2.7% Composition/Division: Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 0.2% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 4.6% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 5.3% Burden of Proof: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 0.4% Anecdotal: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 5.2% Hindsight Bias: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 1.4% Begging the Question: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 1.1% False Dilemma: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst