Israel’s ‘Crimson Thread’ military barrier is strangling the West Bank 73%

By Al Jazeera Staff56%

7/17/2026, 10:15:11 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 39 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 45.3% saturation with 735 hits. Analysis detected 4,151 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,621 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 64.7% and a BS Rank of 73% (6,101 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 72.10% of the article peer group.

Ras al-Ahmar, occupied West Bank  The drive to Thaer Bisharat’s home should take less than 10 minutes from the main road. 
Instead, it took three hours. 
Every gate leading into Ras al-Ahmar, in the northern Jordan Valley, is shut these days. 
Such road closures have become the norm rather than the exception, patrolled in shifts by Israeli soldiers and settlers whose roles on the ground have become increasingly difficult to tell apart. 
The sole access point that remained was a single, winding dirt road, passable only by four-wheel drive vehicles and requiring drivers to evade the roving Israeli patrols. 
During the drive to Thaer’s house, Israeli forces had the area under an even greater lockdown than normal as they were nearby in the al-Buqaia plain, destroying three wells belonging to local Palestinians  including one owned by a relative of Thaer’s. 
This is some of the most fertile land in the occupied West Bank, where farmers normally tend rows of banana trees alongside crops such as grapes, olives and potatoes. 
But along the dirt road leading to Thaer’s isolated home, the farms stand half-abandoned, with plastic greenhouse doors open and flapping in the breeze, as crops go thirsty after water was cut off in the area weeks ago by Israeli authorities. 
“I can’t even run an errand,” said Thaer. 
“From Tamun, the village, it used to take me ten minutes. 
Now, with the current [dirt] road… it takes an hour, at best.” 
He was spending the afternoon alone  his brother and sister-in-law had gone into town that morning for basic necessities. 
Left by himself, it was easy to feel like a sitting duck. 
“Just this morning, there was a car  two people in it, dressed in military gear, army-backed,” he said. 
“They went to the people living near the banana houses. 
They took down ID photos, names, phone numbers. 
And they tell them, ‘You’ve got 24 hours to leave. 
Otherwise we’re coming to confiscate everything you’ve got’.” 
In recent weeks, that pressure has escalated from long-standing “closed military zone” orders issued by the military into outright seizures of private land, alongside the destruction of irrigation pipes, water wells and greenhouses in the barrier’s path  the sharpest expression yet of an advancing takeover in which settler-outpost expansion and land seizure now work in tandem to squeeze out the Palestinians who remain. 
“They cage us in and suffocate us,” Thaer said. 
A trench, an outpost and a series of seizure orders 
That tightening isolation is the result of one of Israel’s newest infrastructure projects in the occupied West Bank: the ‘Crimson Thread’ barrier. 
Announced in 2025, the first part of the project combines a trench and military road running roughly 22km between the Ein Shibli and Tayasir checkpoints  severing the northern Jordan Valley from Tubas to the north and Nablus to the south. 
Israel says it is intended to prevent weapons smuggling from Jordan, but the route runs several kilometres inside the occupied West Bank rather than along the already-fenced Jordanian border. 
The plan is for the barrier to eventually run for 500km, splitting Palestinians from thousands of hectares of land and creating a barrier that  in its consequences  mirrors the separation wall on the other side of the West Bank. 
On March 8, Israeli military commander Gilad Shriki visited several Palestinian communities, and, in their words, warned residents they should leave in preparation for a complete Israeli takeover of the area. 
Then, last month, an Israeli Supreme Court ruling cleared the way for construction of the ‘Crimson Thread’ barrier to proceed. 
Since then, the Israeli Civil Administration has moved aggressively. 
Roughly three kilometres of trenches have already been dug, destroying Palestinian infrastructure in its path  including irrigation pipes, farmland and greenhouses, all while severing farmers from land on the other side. 
The route of the ‘Crimson Thread’ project was stitched together with nine land seizure orders  a “clear escalation” of a decades-long effort by Israeli authorities to remove Palestinians in the area, according to Dror Etkes, who tracks Israeli land policy for Israeli NGO Kerem Navot. 
What started as checkpoints, settlement building and the designation of Palestinian lands as military firing zones “have in recent years become much more aggressive  through settler attacks, military raids, confiscation of property and denial of access to firing zones”. 
Now, such military land seizure orders allow Israeli authorities to “seize whatever land it deems necessary” for security purposes, says Etkes. 
According to the Colonisation and Wall Resistance Commission, Israeli authorities issued 49 military land-seizure orders in the first half of this year  already exceeding the 47 issued in all of 2025. 
Thaer scoffs at the official rationale. 
“It’s not a military road,” he said. 
“You don’t dig a trench two and a half, three metres deep for that.” 
‘Effectively in a prison’ 
Etkes said the barrier accomplishes two things at once: “blocking Palestinians’ ability to enter everything east of the barrier”  where most of their farmland is  while linking existing illegal settlements to a new outpost being built along the route, on Jabal Tamun, that he expects to further impact 8-9,000 dunams (8 to 9sq km) of Palestinian agricultural land, most of it in Area B. 
“The majority of communities aren’t there anymore  they’ve been forced to leave, which convinced [Israeli authorities] that the time was right for the next move,” said Etkes, listing emptied communities such as Khirbet Samra and Khirbet Yarza. 
A Kerem Navot map shows the ‘Crimson Thread’ barrier route curling around Khirbet Yarza  but by the time construction reached it, Khirbet Yarza was already gone, with its residents displaced by settlers months earlier. 
Mahdi Daraghmeh, who heads the al-Maleh village council, has watched the same pattern unfold throughout the hamlets he oversees. 
“Settler terror and fear have pushed many families to leave,” he said. 
“In the communities here, 130 families have been displaced  they’ve abandoned their structures, their homes, their land. 
And now they’ve lost their livelihoods  they have nothing left to live on.” 
Since the June Supreme Court ruling, Israeli authorities have carried out near-daily operations in the area, cutting water supplies, destroying tanks and confiscating tractors and other farming equipment. 
“They confiscated the tractors and water tanks from us here,” said Thaer. 
“So they claim these tractors and tanks are a threat to their security. 
A threat to your security, how?” 
At the same time, settlers brought caravans into the area east of Ras al-Ahmar, positioning themselves inside territory expected to be cut off from Palestinian communities. 
On June 16, bulldozers demolished livestock infrastructure at the home of Bilal Bani Oudeh, a friend of Thaer’s, and warned him to leave within 24 hours. 
He refused, so that night, settlers returned and brutally assaulted him. 
“He nearly died,” Thaer said. 
“After they attacked him, they talked about tying him to a rope behind a vehicle. 
They took everything he owned.” 
With authorities working assiduously to keep observers from documenting or photographing the ‘Crimson Thread’ operation, excavation has uprooted hundreds of olive and grape trees while repeatedly severing irrigation pipelines serving tens of thousands of dunams. 
On the morning of July 14 alone, Israeli authorities destroyed three wells in al-Buqaia  including one belonging to Bisharat’s relative  and confiscated pumps and equipment. 
The Atuf village council  one of those affected by the new barrier  put that single day’s damage at more than four million shekels ($1.3m). 
Already, this destruction has decimated the local economy in weeks, wiping out the summer harvest. 
“There’s no agricultural season to speak of,” Daraghmeh said. 
“Most of the land hasn’t been cultivated and what has been cultivated is for the settlers’ benefit.” 
When the trench is finished, cutting communities off from each other and their farmland, residents fear it will mark the end of a Palestinian presence here. 
“Our communities will have no services, no infrastructure whatsoever,” said Daraghmeh. 
“No hospital, no emergency centre, no schools; for all of that, people have to go to the neighbouring town and that will be impossible.” 
“Once this trench cuts people off,” he said, “the people here will effectively be in a prison.” 
‘Give us the rights of the animals’ 
With Israeli authorities having shut off water into the area for weeks, one tank now costs Thaer more than 300 shekels ($100), more than triple the previous price. 
But even transporting water is a perilous pursuit; his brother was recently beaten and held at gunpoint by marauding settlers, who he said stole his phone and robbed him of his money. 
Thaer estimates that agricultural production in the area has collapsed by as much as 90 percent, while many families have already lost half their livestock because they can no longer reach grazing land. 
But among neighbouring communities now erased, Thaer has seen this playbook before: once Palestinians are removed, he says, the settlers take over their lands. 
“Then suddenly there’s no more ‘firing zone,'” Thaer said. 
“A road appears, water arrives, sheep arrive. 
Life comes back to the place, thank God! 
“So why do I get told it’s all a military zone?” 
Thaer looked out at the Israeli settlement farms, lush and green in the distance. 
Around his own property, the ground was parched, littered with half-abandoned equipment. 
“Under their ‘law’, we are treated like animals,” he remarked. 
Thaer paused. 
“Israel always talks about ‘rights’, ‘rights’, ‘rights’,” he said. 
“When someone hits a dog, suddenly, there’s animal rights advocates everywhere.” 
“So actually, we don’t even want human rights,” he said. 
“Just give us the animal rights they talk so much about. 
At this point, we’d settle for living under that.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 22.0%Al Jazeera Staff: 2.6%Al Jazeera: 2.7%Confirmation Bias22.0%This article: 1.4%Al Jazeera Staff: 0.7%Al Jazeera: 0.8%Anchoring Bias1.4%This article: 9.3%Al Jazeera Staff: 3.0%Al Jazeera: 2.8%Availability Heuristic9.3%This article: 2.2%Al Jazeera Staff: 0.7%Al Jazeera: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic2.2%This article: 7.2%Al Jazeera Staff: 0.5%Al Jazeera: 0.4%Hindsight Bias7.2%This article: 6.1%Al Jazeera Staff: 2.6%Al Jazeera: 2.1%Overconfidence Bias6.1%This article: 12.3%Al Jazeera Staff: 10.2%Al Jazeera: 8.5%Framing Effect12.3%This article: 1.7%Al Jazeera Staff: 0.4%Al Jazeera: 0.6%Loss Aversion1.7%This article: 1.9%Al Jazeera Staff: 0.6%Al Jazeera: 0.6%Status Quo Bias1.9%This article: 0.9%Al Jazeera Staff: 0.1%Al Jazeera: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.9%This article: 0.0%Al Jazeera Staff: 2.8%Al Jazeera: 2.5%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 3.6%Al Jazeera Staff: 2.5%Al Jazeera: 2.7%Pessimism Bias3.6%This article: 45.3%Al Jazeera Staff: 10.4%Al Jazeera: 10.3%Negativity Bias45.3%This article: 2.1%Al Jazeera Staff: 2.7%Al Jazeera: 1.8%Self-Serving Bias2.1%This article: 0.0%Al Jazeera Staff: 1.2%Al Jazeera: 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 1.9%Al Jazeera Staff: 0.2%Al Jazeera: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias1.9%This article: 0.0%Al Jazeera Staff: 1.6%Al Jazeera: 1.5%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Al Jazeera Staff: 1.1%Al Jazeera: 0.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.9%Al Jazeera Staff: 0.8%Al Jazeera: 1.0%Halo Effect0.9%This article: 0.0%Al Jazeera Staff: 0.0%Al Jazeera: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Al Jazeera Staff: 0.0%Al Jazeera: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 4.4%Al Jazeera Staff: 2.0%Al Jazeera: 1.8%Recency Bias4.4%This article: 0.3%Al Jazeera Staff: 0.2%Al Jazeera: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.3%This article: 0.0%Al Jazeera Staff: 0.0%Al Jazeera: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.4%Al Jazeera Staff: 1.2%Al Jazeera: 0.8%Ad Hominem0.4%This article: 0.7%Al Jazeera Staff: 0.1%Al Jazeera: 0.1%Straw Man0.7%This article: 9.4%Al Jazeera Staff: 4.4%Al Jazeera: 4.0%Appeal to Authority9.4%This article: 4.2%Al Jazeera Staff: 1.6%Al Jazeera: 1.9%False Dilemma4.2%This article: 6.6%Al Jazeera Staff: 0.9%Al Jazeera: 1.0%Slippery Slope6.6%This article: 1.4%Al Jazeera Staff: 0.2%Al Jazeera: 0.2%Circular Reasoning1.4%This article: 14.3%Al Jazeera Staff: 3.3%Al Jazeera: 3.6%Hasty Generalization14.3%This article: 0.0%Al Jazeera Staff: 0.2%Al Jazeera: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Al Jazeera Staff: 0.4%Al Jazeera: 0.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 16.9%Al Jazeera Staff: 6.6%Al Jazeera: 5.1%Appeal to Emotion16.9%This article: 0.0%Al Jazeera Staff: 1.2%Al Jazeera: 0.9%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 19.9%Al Jazeera Staff: 3.0%Al Jazeera: 3.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)19.9%This article: 0.0%Al Jazeera Staff: 0.2%Al Jazeera: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 2.8%Al Jazeera Staff: 0.6%Al Jazeera: 0.4%Burden of Proof2.8%This article: 0.9%Al Jazeera Staff: 0.1%Al Jazeera: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.9%This article: 4.1%Al Jazeera Staff: 0.2%Al Jazeera: 0.2%Composition/Division4.1%This article: 14.5%Al Jazeera Staff: 1.5%Al Jazeera: 1.2%Anecdotal14.5%This article: 0.6%Al Jazeera Staff: 0.1%Al Jazeera: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.6%This article: 1.2%Al Jazeera Staff: 2.3%Al Jazeera: 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)1.2%This article: 0.0%Al Jazeera Staff: 0.0%Al Jazeera: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Al Jazeera Staff: 0.1%Al Jazeera: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.4%Al Jazeera Staff: 0.0%Al Jazeera: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.4%This article: 0.6%Al Jazeera Staff: 0.2%Al Jazeera: 0.1%Special Pleading0.6%This article: 0.8%Al Jazeera Staff: 0.1%Al Jazeera: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.8%This article: 11.7%Al Jazeera Staff: 3.4%Al Jazeera: 2.8%Unattributed Quote11.7%This article: 1.2%Al Jazeera Staff: 2.0%Al Jazeera: 1.6%Quote-first Misdirection1.2%This article: 18.0%Al Jazeera Staff: 4.8%Al Jazeera: 4.2%Biased Writer Voice18.0%This article: 0.0%Al Jazeera Staff: 1.0%Al Jazeera: 0.8%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Al Jazeera Staff: 1.3%Al Jazeera: 1.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Al Jazeera Staff: 0.2%Al Jazeera: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 2.2%Al Jazeera Staff: 0.2%Al Jazeera: 0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…2.2%

1621 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers38%attributed speech1,004writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 42 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 41 words • 100.0% coverageThaer Bisharat • 8 words • 100.0% coverageThaer Bisharat • 11 words • 0.0% coverageThaer Bisharat • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageThaer Bisharat • 19 words • 100.0% coverageThaer Bisharat • 10 words • 0.0% coverageThaer Bisharat • 8 words • 100.0% coverageThaer Bisharat • 10 words • 100.0% coverageThaer Bisharat • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 64 words • 100.0% coverageThaer Bisharat • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 41 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 41 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageDror Etkes • 46 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 0.0% coverageDror Etkes • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageThaer Bisharat • 7 words • 0.0% coverageThaer Bisharat • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageDror Etkes • 66 words • 0.0% coverageDror Etkes • 38 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageMahdi Daraghmeh • 12 words • 100.0% coverageMahdi Daraghmeh • 18 words • 0.0% coverageMahdi Daraghmeh • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageThaer Bisharat • 12 words • 0.0% coverageThaer Bisharat • 13 words • 0.0% coverageThaer Bisharat • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageThaer Bisharat • 5 words • 0.0% coverageThaer Bisharat • 15 words • 100.0% coverageThaer Bisharat • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageMahdi Daraghmeh • 9 words • 0.0% coverageMahdi Daraghmeh • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageMahdi Daraghmeh • 11 words • 0.0% coverageMahdi Daraghmeh • 24 words • 0.0% coverageMahdi Daraghmeh • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 100.0% coverageThaer Bisharat • 33 words • 0.0% coverageThaer Bisharat • 24 words • 0.0% coverageThaer Bisharat • 9 words • 0.0% coverageThaer Bisharat • 7 words • 0.0% coverageThaer Bisharat • 8 words • 0.0% coverageThaer Bisharat • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageThaer Bisharat • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageThaer Bisharat • 9 words • 0.0% coverageThaer Bisharat • 11 words • 0.0% coverageThaer Bisharat • 10 words • 0.0% coverageThaer Bisharat • 11 words • 0.0% coverageThaer Bisharat • 9 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Dror Etkes

100%flagged-word coverage
171 attributed words28% of attributed speech91% writer coverage
0%15.0%30.0%Biased Writer Voice+2.5 ptsWriter: 24.4%Dror Etkes: 26.9%26.9%Unattributed Quote+3.4 ptsWriter: 8.9%Dror Etkes: 12.3%12.3%Attempt to Sell a Product -3.5 ptsWriter: 3.5%Dror Etkes: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.