Speaker summary
82% 3 analyzed articles/videos 529.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dr. Omar Mohammed results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 30% saturation with 210 hits . Analysis detected 1,651.318 faulty-reasoning hits from 529.5 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 9.4% and a BS Rank of 11% (25,495 of 28,364 speakers). This Dr. Omar Mohammed is better (less manipulative) than 89.90% of the peer group. Dr. Omar Mohammed
Speaker details
Total words: 529.5
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 10.1% percentile 9.4% BS Score3 analyzed videos529.5 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 35.9% 35.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 25.6% 25.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 9.8% 9.8% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 14.6% 14.6% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 14.4% 14.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 23.8% 23.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 3.7% 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 15.2% 15.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 30.0% 30.0% Tu Quoque Sitewide 0.2% Speaker 8.1% 8.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 35.9%, sitewide 7.5% Negativity Bias: Speaker 30.0%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 25.6%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 23.8%, sitewide 11.1% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 15.6%, sitewide 9.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 15.2%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 14.6%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Speaker 14.4%, sitewide 1.5% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 9.4%, sitewide 4.6% Tu Quoque: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 0.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 0.0% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 2.5% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 4.0% Composition/Division: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 0.2% Hindsight Bias: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 1.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 3.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst