Speaker summary
⁠80%1 analyzed article/video93 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dr Niamh McCullagh results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Anchoring Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 51.6% saturation with 48 hits. Analysis detected 221 faulty-reasoning hits from 93 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 33.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠53% (13,493 of 28,364 speakers). This Dr Niamh McCullagh is worse (more manipulative) than 52.40% of the peer group.
Dr Niamh McCullagh
Speaker details
Total words: 93
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

52% percentile
025507510052.4% percentile
33.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos93 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 51.6%51.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 48.4%48.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 26.6%26.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 26.6%26.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 26.6%26.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 23.4%23.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 51.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 48.4%, sitewide 7.5%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 26.6%, sitewide 4.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 26.6%, sitewide 11.1%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 26.6%, sitewide 1.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 23.4%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos