Author summary
66% 1 analyzed article/video 367 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jada Bas results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 24.8% saturation with 273 hits . Analysis detected 1,076 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,101 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.1% and a BS Rank of 88% (800 of 6,508 authors). This Jada Bas is worse (more manipulative) than 87.70% of the peer group. Jada Bas
Author details
Total words: 1,101
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
88% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 87.7% percentile 6.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.4% 7.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.0% 7.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 24.8% 24.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.2% 5.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 10.7% 10.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.7% 1.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 6.1% 6.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 7.4% 7.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 24.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 10.7%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.6%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 4.0% Optimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst