Speaker summary
⁠70%1 analyzed article/video27 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dr. Jon Franco results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 57.6% saturation with 19 hits. Analysis detected 66 faulty-reasoning hits from 27 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠71% (11,236 of 38,332 speakers). This Dr. Jon Franco is worse (more manipulative) than 70.70% of the peer group.
Dr. Jon Franco
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠71%Dr. Jon Franco (selected)50%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 27
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

71% percentile
025507510070.7% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos27 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 57.6%57.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 57.6%57.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 42.4%42.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 42.4%42.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 57.6%, sitewide 11.1%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 57.6%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 42.4%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 42.4%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos