Speaker summary
53% 2 analyzed articles/videos 155.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Doug Bradburn results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Confirmation Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with False Dilemma as the most egregious example at 20.2% saturation with 49 hits . Analysis detected 402.71 faulty-reasoning hits from 155.333 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 10.8% and a BS Rank of 14% (24,655 of 28,364 speakers). This Doug Bradburn is better (less manipulative) than 86.90% of the peer group. Doug Bradburn
Speaker details
Total words: 155.333
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
13% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 13.1% percentile 10.8% BS Score2 analyzed videos155.3 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 33.6% 33.6% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 20.2% 20.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 17.3% 17.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 5.8% 5.8% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 14.4% 14.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 14.4% 14.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 15.2% 15.2% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Speaker 5.8% 5.8% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 7.4% 7.4% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 5.8% 5.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 33.6%, sitewide 7.5% False Dilemma: Speaker 20.2%, sitewide 1.5% Negativity Bias: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 19.2% Indoctrination: Speaker 17.3%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 16.9%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 15.2%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 14.4%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 14.4%, sitewide 5.3% Recency Bias: Speaker 14.4%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 2.7% In-Group Bias: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 6.9% Burden of Proof: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 0.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 1.9% Anecdotal: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Loss Aversion: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 2.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 3.3% Red Herring: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 0.7% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst