Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,311 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bret Baier results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Halo Effect, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 12.8% saturation with 671 hits. Analysis detected 4,896 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,244 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (2,913 of 6,244 authors). This Bret Baier is worse (more manipulative) than 53.40% of the peer group.
Bret Baier
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠54%Bret Baier (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,244
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

53% percentile
025507510053.4% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.3%3.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 0.5%0.5%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 12.8%12.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 8.4%8.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.0%4.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 6.5%6.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.1%2.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.5%4.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 9.6%9.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.4%, sitewide 15.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 12.8%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.0%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.6%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.5%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Author 7.8%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Indoctrination: Author 6.5%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 5.0%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos