Speaker summary
⁠76%1 analyzed article/video60 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dorcas Mudimo results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Bandwagon, and Optimism Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 67.5 hits. Analysis detected 241.375 faulty-reasoning hits from 60 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 51.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (8,135 of 28,364 speakers). This Dorcas Mudimo is worse (more manipulative) than 71.30% of the peer group.
Dorcas Mudimo
Speaker details
Total words: 60
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

71% percentile
025507510071.3% percentile
51.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos60 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 56.1%56.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 37.8%37.8%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 37.8%37.8%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Speaker 37.8%37.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 37.8%37.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Speaker 56.1%, sitewide 6.9%Bandwagon: Speaker 37.8%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Speaker 37.8%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 37.8%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 37.8%, sitewide 1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos