Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 774 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Prosper Heri Ngorora results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Optimism Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 16.6% saturation with 515 hits . Analysis detected 3,354 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,096 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 65% (2,336 of 6,628 authors). This Prosper Heri Ngorora is worse (more manipulative) than 64.80% of the peer group. Prosper Heri Ngorora
Author details
Total words: 3,096
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
65% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 64.8% percentile 3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.4% 7.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 16.6% 16.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 10.1% 10.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.0% 3.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 10.4% 10.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 16.6%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Author 10.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 10.1%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.9%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.1%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.0%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst