Speaker summary
⁠54%2 analyzed articles/videos175.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Donovan Richards results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hasty Generalization, and In-Group Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 31.8% saturation with 75.75 hits. Analysis detected 432.125 faulty-reasoning hits from 175.333 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 14.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠21% (22,532 of 28,364 speakers). This Donovan Richards is better (less manipulative) than 79.40% of the peer group.
Donovan Richards
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠21%Donovan Richards (selected)15%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 175.333
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

21% percentile
025507510020.6% percentile
14.2% BS Score2 analyzed videos175.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 31.8%31.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 18.4%18.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 9.8%9.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 9.8%9.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 16.0%16.0%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 11.3%11.3%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 9.8%9.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 14.8%14.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 19.5%19.5%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 9.4%9.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 31.8%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 19.5%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 18.4%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Speaker 16.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 14.8%, sitewide 6.7%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Speaker 9.4%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos