Speaker summary
⁠41%2 analyzed articles/videos97.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dimitry Yakoushkin results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Ad Hominem, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 59% saturation with 62 hits. Analysis detected 205 faulty-reasoning hits from 97.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 22% and a BS Rank of ⁠36% (17,932 of 27,763 speakers). This Dimitry Yakoushkin is better (less manipulative) than 64.60% of the peer group.
Dimitry Yakoushkin
Speaker details
Total words: 97.667
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

35% percentile
025507510035.4% percentile
22.0% BS Score2 analyzed videos97.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 59.0%59.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 37.1%37.1%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 19.4%19.4%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 19.1%19.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 19.1%19.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 9.5%9.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 30.5%30.5%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 2.1%2.1%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 59.0%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 37.1%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Speaker 30.5%, sitewide 26.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 19.4%, sitewide 1.5%Ad Hominem: Speaker 19.1%, sitewide 2.2%In-Group Bias: Speaker 19.1%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 5.3%Begging the Question: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 1.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos