Speaker summary
⁠29%2 analyzed articles/videos130.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Digital Chat Station results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic and Anchoring Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 46.7% saturation with 86 hits. Analysis detected 172 faulty-reasoning hits from 130.333 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 31.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠49% (14,462 of 28,364 speakers). This Digital Chat Station is better (less manipulative) than 51.00% of the peer group.
Digital Chat Station
Speaker details
Total words: 130.333
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

49% percentile
025507510049.0% percentile
31.2% BS Score2 analyzed videos130.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 46.7%46.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 29.9%29.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 16.9%16.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 46.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 29.9%, sitewide 9.1%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 16.9%, sitewide 4.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos