Speaker summary
83% 1 analyzed article/video 235 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dickinson results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias , Ad Hominem , and Ambiguity (Equivocation) , with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 26% saturation with 61 hits . Analysis detected 392 faulty-reasoning hits from 235 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 13.9% and a BS Rank of 20% (21,251 of 26,409 speakers). This Dickinson is better (less manipulative) than 80.50% of the peer group. Dickinson
Speaker details
Total words: 235
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
20% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 19.5% percentile 13.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos235 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 26.0% 26.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 23.0% 23.0% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 20.0% 20.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 17.9% 17.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 5.1% 5.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 13.6% 13.6% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 14.9% 14.9% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 15.3% 15.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 7.7% 7.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 10.6% 10.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 13.6%, sitewide 26.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 26.0%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 23.0%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Speaker 20.0%, sitewide 2.2% Negativity Bias: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 19.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 17.9%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 15.3%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Speaker 14.9%, sitewide 1.7% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 10.6%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 6.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst