Speaker summary
⁠97%1 analyzed article/video46 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dianne Feinstein results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Biased Writer Voice, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 23 hits. Analysis detected 115 faulty-reasoning hits from 46 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠69% (8,187 of 26,155 speakers). This Dianne Feinstein is worse (more manipulative) than 68.70% of the peer group.
Dianne Feinstein
Speaker details
Total words: 46
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

69% percentile
025507510068.7% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos46 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos