Speaker summary
⁠67%2 analyzed articles/videos212 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dianna Russini results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Negativity Bias, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 22.6% saturation with 48 hits. Analysis detected 150 faulty-reasoning hits from 212 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 11.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠16% (24,021 of 28,364 speakers). This Dianna Russini is better (less manipulative) than 84.70% of the peer group.
Dianna Russini
Speaker details
Total words: 212
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

15% percentile
025507510015.3% percentile
11.8% BS Score2 analyzed videos212 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 22.6%22.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 11.3%11.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 8.5%8.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 11.3%11.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 8.5%8.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 8.5%8.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 22.6%, sitewide 3.7%Negativity Bias: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 19.2%Anecdotal: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 7.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos