Speaker summary
⁠77%1 analyzed article/video58 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Diamond Ahmadov results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 64.2% saturation with 68 hits. Analysis detected 298.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 58 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 43.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠61% (10,335 of 25,991 speakers). This Diamond Ahmadov is worse (more manipulative) than 60.20% of the peer group.
Diamond Ahmadov
Speaker details
Total words: 58
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

60% percentile
025507510060.2% percentile
43.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos58 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 64.2%64.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 64.2%64.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 35.9%35.9%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 32.1%32.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 17.9%17.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 17.9%17.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 64.2%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 64.2%, sitewide 19.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 35.9%, sitewide 3.3%Slippery Slope: Speaker 32.1%, sitewide 1.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 17.9%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Speaker 17.9%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos