Speaker summary
42% 1 analyzed article/video 713 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Devin Weder results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation) , Bandwagon , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 122.171 hits . Analysis detected 804.541 faulty-reasoning hits from 713 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of 2% (27,867 of 28,364 speakers). This Devin Weder is better (less manipulative) than 98.20% of the peer group. Devin Weder
Speaker details
Total words: 713
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.8% percentile 4.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos713 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 5.7% 5.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 2.5% 2.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 15.2% 15.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 7.9% 7.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 4.6% 4.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 1.6% 1.6% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 7.8% 7.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 4.0% 4.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 19.2% Optimism Bias: Speaker 15.2%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 1.5% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 1.1% Slippery Slope: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst