Speaker summary
59% 1 analyzed article/video 479 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Denver Cook results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.9% saturation with 121 hits . Analysis detected 1,276.151 faulty-reasoning hits from 479 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.2% and a BS Rank of 8% (26,152 of 28,364 speakers). This Denver Cook is better (less manipulative) than 92.20% of the peer group. Denver Cook
Speaker details
Total words: 479
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
8% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 7.8% percentile 8.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos479 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 16.5% 16.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 14.9% 14.9% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 12.4% 12.4% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 11.2% 11.2% Sunk Cost Effect Sitewide 0.3% Speaker 9.6% 9.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 8.3% 8.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 12.7% 12.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 20.4% 20.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 12.4% 12.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 14.9%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 20.4%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 19.1%, sitewide 19.2% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 16.5%, sitewide 3.7% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 12.7%, sitewide 7.5% Begging the Question: Speaker 12.4%, sitewide 1.7% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 12.4%, sitewide 8.1% Slippery Slope: Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 1.7% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 10.8%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Speaker 10.2%, sitewide 6.9% Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 9.6%, sitewide 0.3% Indoctrination: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 6.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 0.8% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 4.0% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Bandwagon: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 2.2% Primacy Effect: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 0.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 1.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst